Religious controversy of dating bones

According to accounts, Julsrud stumbled upon the artifacts while riding his horse in the Acámbaro area.He hired a local farmer to dig up the remaining figures, paying him for each object he found.Every object on this list has been accused of being an elaborate hoax.

Many of these objects have been labeled out of place artifacts or anachronisms.

These archeological discoveries are always controversial and the scientific community is extremely selective in what they accept as fact.

For a long time, the Peking Academy of Prehistory forbade the professor from publishing anything about the Dropa Stones.

However, after many years of debate he published his hypothesis.

Tsum Um Nui claims that an alien spacecraft crashed in the Bayan Har Shan region 12,000 years ago. The Dropa could not repair their craft, so they tried to adapt to the conditions on Earth.

Meanwhile, the local Ham tribesmen hunted down and killed most of the aliens.

According to all history books, humans did not live in the time of the dinosaurs.

Upon the discovery of the figures, many creationists from all over the world proclaimed the artifacts legitimate.

These artifacts tell a story of ancient civilizations, Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contracts, and mysterious technological advancements.

Many of these archaeological discoveries challenge the scientific theory of evolution, as well as many religious beliefs.

A man named Don Patton claims he found radiocarbon dates for the figures ranging from 6500 years to 1500 years ago; however, the objects are in very good shape and show no characteristic evidence of having been in the ground for at least 1500 years.

Tags: , ,